Lizzaraga

(HC) Smith v. Lizzaraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20212:18-cv-00064California9,679 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JIMMY DON SMITH, No. 2:18-CV-0064-KJM-DMC-P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOE LIZZARAGA, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, Respondent’s answer, ECF No. 22, and Petitioner’s traverse, ECF No. 24. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. BACKGROUND A. Facts1 The state court recited the following facts, and petitioner has not offered any clear and convincing evidence to rebut the presumption that these facts are correct:

Samantha Bumgardner testified she worked at the Alta Regional Center, which provided services for developmentally disabled people. For three years she had been the service coordinator…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.