Cota
(PC) Hammler v. Cota
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALLEN HAMMLER, Case No. 2:19-cv-01423-JAM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE E. COTA, et al., RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
DAYS
Defendants.
17 On October 6, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s second amended complaint and notified 18 plaintiff that the complaint impermissibly joined unrelated claims. ECF No. 29. Plaintiff was 19 granted thirty days to file an amended complaint. On December 4, 2020, plaintiff was granted a 20 thirty-day extension of time to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 31. To date, plaintiff has not 21 filed an amended complaint. 22 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines and requires litigants to 23 meet those deadlines. When a plaintiff fails to comply with court-imposed deadlines, the court 24 may dismiss the plaintiff’s case for failure to prosecute. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41; Hells Canyon 25 Pres. Council…