(PC) Zaiza v. Clark
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20211:19-cv-01476California9,817 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 JOSE ROBERTO ZAIZA, 1:19-cv-01476-DAD-GSA-PC
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
Plaintiffs, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE
PROCEED WITH PLAINTIFF’S CLAIMS
vs. AGAINST DEFENDANTS CLARK,
GALLAGER, AND BAUGHMAN FOR
CLARK, et al., INUFFICIENT ACCESS TO OUT-OF-
CELL EXERCISE IN VIOLATION OF
Defendants. THE EIGHTH AMENDMENT, AND
THAT ALL OTHER CLAIMS AND
DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM
FOURTEEN-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE
OBJECTIONS
18 I. PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Jose Roberto Zaiza (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action on October 17, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) On September 28, 2020, the court dismissed the Complaint for failure to state a claim, with leave to amend. (ECF No. 10.) On October 21, 2020, Plaintiff…