(PC) Gleason v. Lynch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 18, 20212:20-cv-01971California1,184 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY GLEASON, No. 2:20-cv-1971-EFB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel and in forma pauperis in an action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. After a dismissal by the court with leave to amend (ECF No. 8), plaintiff has filed “objections”1 (ECF No. 13) and an amended complaint (ECF No. 12), which the court must screen.

1 Plaintiff’s objections are titled “Objections to this Court’s Order Dismissing First Amended Complaint, 10-23-2020.” The court notes that its October 23, 2020 screening order 22 (ECF No. 8) dismissed the original complaint (as the amended complaint had yet to be filed). Liberally construed as a motion for reconsideration, the motion is denied. Plaintiff’s filing of an amended complaint (ECF No. 12) supersedes the original complaint, rendering any objections to its corresponding screening order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.