Patel

(PC) Torres v. Patel

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20211:18-cv-00188California954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL TORRES, No. 1:18-cv-00188-NONE-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND GRANTING

ISMAIL PATEL, et al., DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 48, 54)

17 Plaintiff Miguel Torres is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 3, 2020, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations recommending that defendants’ motion for summary judgment be granted. (Doc. No. 54.) The findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that objections were due within thirty days. (Id. at 20.) After receiving an extension of time, plaintiff filed his objections on November 6, 2020. (Doc. No. 57.) Plaintiff’s objections almost mirror…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.