Rodriguez

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 9 TIENGKHAM SINGANONH, Case No. 1:18-cv-00590-AWI-EPG (PC) Plaintiff,

ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO FILE

v. OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF NON-

OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANTS’

MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT RODRIGUEZ, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 Tiengkham Singanonh (“Plaintiff”) is a former prisoner1 proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 20, 2021, Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 59). Plaintiff has not filed a response or requested additional time to do so. Given this, the Court will direct Plaintiff to file a response to the motion no later than March 19, 2021. The Court notes that while a motion for summary judgment cannot be granted by default, Heinemann v. Satterberg, 731 F.3d 914, 916 (9th Cir. 2013), the Court does have other options when a party fails to respond. For example, if Plaintiff fails to respond, the Court may treat the facts…