Cargill

(PC) Hudson v. Cargill

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20212:20-cv-00481California1,174 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TORIANO GERMAINE HUDSON, Sr., No. 2:20-cv-0481 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT NEUSCHMID, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel. Plaintiff’s second motion for extension of time is before the court. Background This action was opened on February 19, 2020. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint, which was dismissed on September 20, 2020. The court provided plaintiff with detailed standards concerning how to plead a medical claim, granted him sixty days to file a second amended complaint, and sent him the court’s form complaint. On November 23, 2020, plaintiff was granted an additional ninety days in which to amend. On February 11, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for another sixty days due to the coronavirus and the indefinite closure of the prison law library. (ECF No. 29 at 1.) Plaintiff adds that if the court would like to appoint counsel to eliminate all future requests for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.