(SS) Rios v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20211:19-cv-00523California2,186 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MARTHA RIOS, No. 1:19-cv-00523-EPG Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION FOR

ATTORNEY’S FEES PURSUANT TO

v. U.S.C. § 406(B) ANDREW SAUL, Commissioner of Social (ECF No. 21) Security, ORDER DENYING DUPLICATIVE MOTION Defendant. FOR ATTORNEY’S FEES AS MOOOT 15 (ECF No. 19)

ORDER FOR CLERK OF COURT TO MAIL

A COPY OF THIS ORDER TO PLAINTIFF 18 Plaintiff’s counsel, Denise Bourgeois Haley (“counsel”), filed a motion for attorney’s fees on January 15, 2021 and a redacted version thereof on February 11, 2021. (ECF Nos. 19, 21). Plaintiff was served with a copy of the motion when it was first filed and given the opportunity to object within fourteen days of receipt. (ECF No. 19 at 2, 26-27). Plaintiff has not filed any objections or statement concerning the motion. Defendant filed a statement whereby he took no position on the reasonableness of counsel’s request.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.