(HC) Best v. San Joaquin County Superior Court

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 19, 20212:20-cv-01896California1,224 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DARIN GAVIN BEST, No. 2:20-cv-01896-CKD P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SUPERIOR FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

COURT,

15 Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a state inmate proceeding pro se in this habeas corpus action filed pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The court has reviewed the habeas petition as required by Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases and recommends that petitioner’s claims be summarily dismissed without prejudice. I. Factual and Procedural History The instant habeas corpus application challenges petitioner’s 2020 conviction for violating California Penal Code § 4573.6(A) following his no contest plea in the San Joaquin County Superior Court. ECF No. 1 at 1. In his first claim for relief, petitioner contends that he was entrapped into possessing drugs because they were delivered to his cell. ECF No. 1 at 6. In his second claim for relief, petitioner alleges “sexual harassment/sexual…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.