C.D.C.R.
(PC) Coons v. C.D.C.R.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TIMOTHY COONS, Jr., Case No. 2:20-cv-01813-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE AND FAILURE
TO STATE A CLAIM
C.D.C.R,
RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE
Defendant. DAYS 16 17 On November 23, 2020, the court screened plaintiff’s first amended complaint and 18 notified plaintiff that it failed to state a claim. ECF No. 12. Plaintiff was granted sixty days to 19 file an amended complaint. Id. To date, plaintiff has not filed a second amended complaint. 20 To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines on litigants and requires 21 litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for plaintiff’s failure to prosecute 22 or failure to comply with its orders or local rules. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b); Hells Canyon Pres. 23 Council v. U.S. Forest Serv., 403 F.3d 683, 689 (9th Cir. 2005); Carey v. King, 856 F.2d 1439, 24 1440-41 (9th Cir. 1988). …