Farhat

(PC) Hearne v. Farhat

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20212:20-cv-00557California1,706 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN HEARNE, No. 2:20-cv-0557 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

ALEX FARHAT, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims he was purposely transferred to a prison where he had documented enemies where he was attacked and injured. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s requests for money damages to be sent to an attorney (ECF Nos. 30, 36) and his second motion for injunctive relief (ECF No. 29). For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny his requests as premature and recommend that plaintiff’s motion for injunctive relief be denied. REQUEST RE DAMAGES CHECK Plaintiff has filed two requests asking that any damages check be sent to an attorney. (ECF Nos. 30, 36.) The court finds that requests related to money damages are premature. Defendants have yet…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.