(PC)Dingle

(PC)Dingle v. Tesluk

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20212:20-cv-01878California573 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID W. DINGLE, No. 2:20-cv-1878 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER GREGORY C. TESLUK, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. Presently before the court are plaintiff’s objections to the court’s findings and recommendations. (ECF No. 12.) By order dated November 5, 2020 the court screened the complaint. (ECF No. 7.) It found plaintiff’s allegations failed to state a claim. The complaint was dismissed with sixty days leave to amend. On January 27, 2021, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations recommending that this action be dismissed for failure to file an amended complaint. (ECF No. 11.) Plaintiff has filed objections. (ECF No. 12.) Therein, he states that a fellow inmate has been assisting him with this case, that inmate has all the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.