Brown

(PC) Morgan v. Brown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20212:20-cv-01433California470 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ARSENIO RUSSHON MORGAN, Case No. 2:20-cv-01433-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

MICHAEL BROWN, et al., FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

17 18 On September 29, 2020, the previously assigned magistrate judge screened plaintiff’s 19 complaint, found that it failed to state a claim, and granted plaintiff thirty days to file an amended 20 complaint. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff failed to timely file an amended complaint. Accordingly, on 21 November 17, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to show cause within thirty days why this action should 22 not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to state a claim. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff was 23 notified that if he wished to continue with this lawsuit, he must file an amended complaint. He 24 was also warned that failure to comply with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.