Pinkyard
(PC) Williams v. Pinkyard
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAHDI KALU WILLIAMS, Case No. 2:19-cv-01737-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR
v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND
K. PINKYARD, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL
RULES
Defendants.
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS 17 18 On November 3, 2020, defendants filed a motion to compel plaintiff to provide discovery. ECF No. 25. In violation of Local Rule 230(l), plaintiff failed to timely file a response to defendants’ motion. Accordingly, on December 17, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the court’s local rules. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff was notified that if he wished to continue this lawsuit, he also needed to file, within twenty-one days, a response to defendants’…