Pinkyard

(PC) Williams v. Pinkyard

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20212:19-cv-01737California448 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAHDI KALU WILLIAMS, Case No. 2:19-cv-01737-KJM-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

K. PINKYARD, et al., FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH LOCAL

RULES

Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS 17 18 On November 3, 2020, defendants filed a motion to compel plaintiff to provide discovery. ECF No. 25. In violation of Local Rule 230(l), plaintiff failed to timely file a response to defendants’ motion. Accordingly, on December 17, 2020, plaintiff was ordered to show cause within twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute and for failure to comply with the court’s local rules. ECF No. 27. Plaintiff was notified that if he wished to continue this lawsuit, he also needed to file, within twenty-one days, a response to defendants’…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.