Pascua

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARQUISE DRUMWRIGHT, Case No.: 1:20-cv-01055-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

SUBMIT A RESPONSE

v. (Doc. 8) F. PASCUA, et al.,

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 16 Previously, plaintiff filed a form complaint in which the section to list facts supporting his claims was left blank but for the words “See Attached,” apparently referencing a document that was not in fact attached to the complaint. (Doc. 1.) Because the complaint itself contained no factual allegations, the Court informed plaintiff that it was subject to dismissal. (Doc. 7.) Plaintiff has now filed a pleading that he contends was supposed to be attached to his original complaint. (Doc. 8.) The Court will construe this filing as a First Amended Complaint. (Doc. 8.) Generally, the Court is required to screen complaints brought by inmates seeking relief against a governmental entity or an officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The…