Farhat

(PC) Hearne v. Farhat

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20212:20-cv-00557California4,786 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JOHN HEARNE, No. 2:20-cv-0557 JAM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ALEX FARHAT, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims he was purposely transferred to a prison where he had documented enemies where he was attacked and injured. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s second amended complaint for screening (ECF No. 35). For the reasons set forth below, the court will give plaintiff the option to proceed with the complaint as screened or file an amended complaint. BACKGROUND Plaintiff initiated this action with the filing of the original complaint. (ECF No. 1.) The court determined the first amended complaint stated cognizable failure to protect and retaliation claims but failed to state a cognizable deliberate indifference or due process claim. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff was given the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.