Fox

(HC) Anthony L. Zeigler v. Fox

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 22, 20212:18-cv-00578California8,721 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY L. ZEIGLER, No. 2:18-CV-0578-TLN-DMC-P Petitioner, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS ROBERT FOX, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Pending before the Court are Petitioner’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus, ECF No. 1, and Respondent’s answer, ECF No. 17. Petitioner has not filed a traverse. / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / / I. BACKGROUND A. Facts1 The California Court of Appeal recited the following facts in its decision on direct appeal, and Petitioner has not offered any clear and convincing evidence to rebut the presumption that these facts are correct:

2013 Stabbing

In May 2013, Joshua Hendon, Kevin Brazil, and Alexander Salas went to a bar in Chico. Hendon and defendant got into a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.