(PC) Miles v. Garland

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20212:19-cv-01881California263 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MAURICE MILES, SR. No. 2:19-CV-01881-MCE-CKD P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS DANIEL GARLAND, et al., Defendants. 16 By order filed January 13, 2021, plaintiff’s third amended complaint was dismissed and thirty days leave to file a fourth amended complaint was granted. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise responded to the court’s order. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations, plaintiff may file written objections with the court. The document should be captioned “Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Findings 27 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.