Cates

(HC) Haynie v. Cates

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 23, 20212:19-cv-01967California567 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DONELL THOMAS HAYNIE, No. 2:19-cv-1967 KJM AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER M. SPEARMAN,1 Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Plaintiff has notified the court that on January 11, 2021, in In re Haynie, No. 20HC00751, the Sacramento County Superior Court determined that petitioner had made a prima facie case for relief on grounds that he was unlawfully sentenced. Plaintiff alleged and provided documentary support for his allegation that the sentencing court had never held a trial on petitioner’s California Penal Code § 667(a) strike priors and never formally found them to be true. See ECF No. 33 at 7.

The court notes for the record that petitioner is currently housed at…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.