(PC) Micenheimer v. Kern Valley State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20211:19-cv-00115California499 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CORY DWAYNE MICENHEIMER, 1:19-cv-00115-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE

vs. BE DISMISSED, WITH PREJUDICE,

FOR FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM,

KERN VALLEY STATE PRISON, et al., FAILURE TO OBEY A COURT ORDER,

AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE

Defendants. (Doc. No. 22.)

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE IN

FOURTEEN (14) DAYS

21 Plaintiff, Corey Dwayne Micenheimer is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On January 24, 2019, plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action. (Doc. No. 1.) On February 11, 2019, the court screened the complaint and issued an order dismissing the complaint for failure to state a claim and violation of Rule 8(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, with leave to file an amended complaint within thirty days. (Doc. No. 7.) On July 1, 2019,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.