Rahimifar
(PC) Coston v. Rahimifar
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL MURPHY COSTON, No. 1:17-cv-000765-HBK Plaintiff,
ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
v. RECONSIDERATION Doc. No. 75. MAJIAD RAHIMIFAR, M.D., et al. 15 Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s pro se motion titled “Request for Reconsideration by District Judge of Magistrate Judge Order ECF [57] & [63]. Local Rule 303, F.R.C. P. 72. Plaintiff’s Alternative Notice of Appeal. F.R.A. 3-4.” filed on October 14, 2020. Doc. No. 75. Only Defendant Rahimifar, M.D., filed a response in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion on November 2, 2022. Doc. No. 80. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND On December 8, 2020, this case was re-assigned from Magistrate Judge Peterson to the undersigned. See Doc. No. 81. A review of the docket reveals Plaintiff, a prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se Civil Rights Complaint under 42 U.S.C. §…