Rahimifar

(PC) Coston v. Rahimifar

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20211:17-cv-00765California1,525 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL MURPHY COSTON, No. 1:17-cv-000765-HBK Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

v. RECONSIDERATION Doc. No. 75. MAJIAD RAHIMIFAR, M.D., et al. 15 Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s pro se motion titled “Request for Reconsideration by District Judge of Magistrate Judge Order ECF [57] & [63]. Local Rule 303, F.R.C. P. 72. Plaintiff’s Alternative Notice of Appeal. F.R.A. 3-4.” filed on October 14, 2020. Doc. No. 75. Only Defendant Rahimifar, M.D., filed a response in opposition to Plaintiff’s motion on November 2, 2022. Doc. No. 80. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denies Plaintiff’s motion. I. BACKGROUND On December 8, 2020, this case was re-assigned from Magistrate Judge Peterson to the undersigned. See Doc. No. 81. A review of the docket reveals Plaintiff, a prisoner, initiated this action by filing a pro se Civil Rights Complaint under 42 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.