Bien

Bien v. City of Fresno

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20211:20-cv-01159California3,625 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6 CASE: 1:20-cv- 01159-AWI-BAM JOHN BIEN,

Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT

CITY OF FRESNO’S MOTION TO

v. DISMISS AND DENYING DEFENDANT

CITY OF FRESNO’S MOTION FOR A

CITY OF FRESNO and DOES 1-10, MORE DEFINITE STATEMENT AS inclusive M OOT Defendants.

(Doc. No. 8)

15 Plaintiff John Bien filed this action on August 18, 2020, bringing seven claims against the City of Fresno (the “City”) and several Doe Defendants in its employ for violations of state law and his constitutional rights. Doc. No. 1. The City brought a motion under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure to dismiss the three claims against it for failure to allege facts sufficient to state a claim and a motion under Rule 12(e)1 for a more definite statement as to all claims in the Complaint. Doc. No. 8. The motions have been fully briefed and the Court has deemed them suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g). For…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.