Rolfing

(PC) Parks v. Rolfing

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20212:15-cv-01505California797 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Kenneth Wayne Parks, No. 2:15-cev-1505-KJM-CKD Plaintiff, ORDER v. Jeffrey Rohlfing, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Kenneth Parks, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action 18 seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 22, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which recommend granting the defendants’ amended motion for summary judgment in part and denying itin part. See Am. Mot. Summ. J., ECF No. 121; F&Rs, ECF No. 144. These findings and recommendations were served on the parties and contained notice that any objections to the 24 findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Parks did not object. Defendants Miranda and Rohlfing…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.