Pallares

(HC) Belyew v. Pallares

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20212:19-cv-00294California615 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 LISA MARIE BELYEW, No. 2:19-cv-0294 AC P Petitioner, v. ORDER MIKE PALLARES, Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 18, 2021, petitioner filed a motion for release on her own recognizance pending appeal. ECF No. 11. For the reasons stated below, the motion will be denied. I. RELEVANT FACTS In the instant motion, petitioner references two 2018 state cases of hers – one in Butte County (16CF06270) and one in Colusa County (CR-57771) – in which she was eventually convicted of criminal offenses. See ECF No. 11 at 1-2. It is the conviction in the Colusa matter that petitioner challenges in the first amended petition. See ECF No. 7 at 1. The instant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.