Pfeiffer
(PC) White v. Pfeiffer
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20211:19-cv-01786California5,224 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BOBBY WHITE, 1:19-cv-01786-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR
FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, WITH
vs. LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 1.) PFEIFFER, et al.,
THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE FIRST
Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT NOT
EXCEEDING 25 PAGES
16 I. BACKGROUND Bobby White (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s Complaint is now before the court for screening. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 26 …