Pfeiffer

(PC) White v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 25, 20211:19-cv-01786California5,224 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BOBBY WHITE, 1:19-cv-01786-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER DISMISSING COMPLAINT FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM, WITH

vs. LEAVE TO AMEND (ECF No. 1.) PFEIFFER, et al.,

THIRTY-DAY DEADLINE TO FILE FIRST

Defendants. AMENDED COMPLAINT NOT

EXCEEDING 25 PAGES

16 I. BACKGROUND Bobby White (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 23, 2019, Plaintiff filed the Complaint commencing this action. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s Complaint is now before the court for screening. 28 U.S.C. § 1915. II. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are legally 26 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.