(HC)Ernst

(HC)Ernst v. State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 26, 20212:20-cv-01716California453 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STEVEN ERNST, Case No. 2:20-cv-01716-JAM-JDP (HC) Petitioner, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS

CASE SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS, AND

STATE OF CALIFORNIA, FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM Respondent. RESPONSE DUE WITHIN TWENTY-ONE

DAYS

19 On December 22, 2020, the court screened petitioner’s petition for writ of habeas corpus and notified petitioner that it failed to state a claim. Petitioner was granted thirty days to either file an amended petition or inform the court that he chooses to stand by his original petition. To date, he has not filed an amended petition nor otherwise responded to the December 22, 2020 order. To manage its docket effectively, the court imposes deadlines and requires litigants to meet those deadlines. The court may dismiss a case for petitioner’s failure to prosecute or failure to comply with its…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.