(PC) Gleason v. Lynch

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20212:21-cv-00253California390 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STANLEY GLEASON, No. 2:21-cv-0253 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER JEFF LYNCH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a former inmate at California State Prison – Sacramento, is proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis. See ECF Nos. 1 at 1-1, 2, 5. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. While plaintiff was incarcerated, he submitted the appropriate documents which made the showing required by 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). See ECF Nos. 2, 5. However, since doing so, plaintiff has been released from prison. See generally ECF No. 1 at 1. If plaintiff still wishes to proceed in forma pauperis, he must submit an updated application under § 1915(a)(1). See DeBlasio v. Gilmore, 315 F.3d 396, 398 (4th Cir. 2003); Adler v. Gonzalez, No. 1:11-cv-1915- LJO-MJS (PC), 2015 WL…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.