Mann

Mann v. City of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20212:17-cv-01201California6,562 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA ----oo0oo---- 11 ROBERT MANN, SR., et al. No. 2:17-cv-01201 WBS DB Plaintiffs, v. ORDER RE: DEFENDANTS’ AMENDED

MOTION TO DISMISS

CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al. Defendants. 17 ----oo0oo---- Plaintiffs Robert Mann Sr. (“Robert”), Vern Murphy-Mann (“Vern”), and Deborah Mann (“Deborah”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”) brought this action against defendants City of Sacramento, the Sacramento Police Department, Samuel D. Somers Jr. (“Chief Somers”), John C. Tennis (“Officer Tennis”), and Randy R. Lozoya (“Officer Lozoya”) (collectively, “defendants”), under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, seeking damages arising from the killing of their brother, Joseph Mann (“Joseph”), by Officers Tennis and Lozoya on July 11, 2016. (See Compl. (Docket No. 1).)

Plaintiffs’ original complaint listed two additional Plaintiffs claimed that, by shooting and killing Joseph, Officers Tennis and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.