(PC)Myers

(PC)Myers v. California Correctional Healthcare Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20212:20-cv-00561California330 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 MICHAEL CRAIG MYERS, No. 2:20-cv-0561 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER CALIFORNIA CORRECTIONAL

HEALTHCARE SERVICES,

14 Defendant.

16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges his rights were violated when a laptop that may have contained some of his personal information was stolen. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On September 8, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. F&R, ECF No. 10. Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.