Troth

(PC) Leen v. Troth

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaFebruary 24, 20212:20-cv-02039California339 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 DOVIE D. LEEN, No. 2:20-cv-2039 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER M. TROTH, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants used excessive force against him in violation of his Eighth Amendment rights. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On November 16, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within thirty days. (ECF No. 10.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.