J.A.
J.A. v. Madera County
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 J.A., et al., Case No. 1:21-cv-00252-NONE-EPG Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION OF
LUZ ANA VENEGAS FOR
v. APPOINTMENT AS GUARDAIN AD
LITEM FOR J.A., A MINOR, WITHOUT
COUNTY OF MADERA, et al., PREJUDICE Defendants. (ECF No. 2) 16 On February 23, 2021, Plaintiffs J.A., a minor, and Luz Ana Venegas, individually and as successor-in-interest to decedent Artemio Alfaro, filed this action against the County of Madera, Brendan Johnson, Logan Majeski, Jose Iniguez, Jeffrey Thomas, and Does 1 through 25 (“Defendants”) alleging claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and California state law related to the 20 shooting death of Artemio Alfaro. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff Luz Ana Venegas also filed an 21 application to appoint her as guardian ad litem for minor plaintiff J.A. on February 23, 2021. 22 (ECF No. 2.) Because the application does not comply with Local Rule 202, the Court will deny 23 the application without prejudice.