Josiah

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ROBIN E. JACKSON, No. 2:19–cv–0671–JAM–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER v. (ECF No. 34) MARSHA J. JOSIAH, et al., Defendants. 16 On February 23, 2021, plaintiff filed a motion for leave to supplement the pleadings in her complaint under Rule 15(d) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. (ECF No. 34.) The court must deny this motion as filed for several reasons. First, plaintiff did not notice the motion on the court’s motion calendar, as required by the Local Rules. See L.R. 230(b) (“Except as otherwise provided in these Rules or as ordered or allowed by the Court, all motions shall be noticed on the motion calendar of the assigned Judge or Magistrate Judge.”). Compliance with this rule is important in ensuring that the opposing party has notice of the deadline for submitting any opposition to the motion. Second, plaintiff does not include her proposed supplement with the motion. See

1 Rule 15(d)…