Freddie
(PC) Gradford v. Freddie
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
WILLIAM J. GRADFORD, Case No. 1:19-cv-01252-DAD-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO
EXCHANGE DOCUMENTS
v.
DEPUTY FREDDIE, Defendant(s). 14 William J. Gradford (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On December 14, 2020, the Court issued an order requiring the parties to file scheduling conference statements. (ECF No. 34.) The parties have now filed their statements. (ECF Nos. 36, 38.) The Court has reviewed this case and the parties’ statements. In an effort to secure the just, speedy, and inexpensive disposition of this action,1 the Court will direct that certain documents that are central to the dispute be promptly produced.2 23 1 See, e.g., United States v. W.R. Grace, 526 F.3d 499, 508–09 (9th Cir. 2008) (“We begin with the principle that the district court is charged with effectuating the speedy and…