Lattimore
(PC) Polk v. Lattimore
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SUSAN MAE POLK, No. 1:12-cv-01156-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, v. ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR RECONSIDERATION
MARY LATTIMORE, et al., (Doc. No. 133) Defendants.
16 Plaintiff Susan Mae Polk is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On December 4, 2020, the undersigned adopted the findings and recommendations issued by the assigned magistrate judge (Doc. No. 120), ordering that this action would proceed only on plaintiff’s fifth amended complaint, filed February 15, 2019 (Doc. No. 117), against Defendant Baron for retaliation in violation of the First Amendment and deliberate indifference in violation of the Eighth Amendment; and ordering that all other claims dismissed from this action for failure other to state a claim…