(PC) Maraglino v. State of California

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DOROTHY GRACE MARIE No. 1:20-cv-00826-NONE-SAB (PC)

MARAGLINO,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND Plaintiff, RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING ACTION v. (Doc. Nos. 12, 14) STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Dorothy Maraglino brought this civil rights pro se and in forma pauperis under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging violation of her Eighth and Fourteenth Amendment rights. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. After plaintiff’s initial complaint was screened and dismissed with leave to amend pursuant 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) by the assigned magistrate judge, plaintiff filed the operative first amended complaint (“FAC”) in September 2020. (Doc. Nos. 8, 12.) Screening the FAC, the magistrate judge again found that plaintiff still failed to state a cognizable claim for relief and recommended that this…