Ramos
(PC) Harper v. Ramos
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
DARCY AARON HARPER, 1:17-cv-00606-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING IMPERMISSIBLE
SURREPLY
v. (ECF No. 42.)
DR. RAMOS, et al., Defendants. 14 I. BACKGROUND Darcy Aaron Harper (“Plaintiff”) is a prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This case now proceeds against defendants Htay, Ramos, and Varanisi for providing inadequate medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. On January 8, 2021, defendant Varanisi filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 34.) On February 2, 2021, Plaintiff filed an opposition to the motion. (ECF No. 37.) On February 9, 2021, defendant Varanisi filed a reply to Plaintiff’s opposition. (ECF No. 38.) On February 24, 2021, Plaintiff filed a response to defendant Varanisi’s reply. (ECF No. 42.) The court construes Plaintiff’s response to defendant Varanisi’s reply as an impermissible 25 …