(SS) Solano v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20211:19-cv-01351California5,186 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DANIELLE MARIE SOLANO, ) Case No.: 1:19-cv-1351 JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S APPEAL ) (DOC. 15) AND REMANDING THE ACTION v. ) PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 ) U.S.C. § 405(g) ANDREW SAUL, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ORDER DIRECTING ENTRY OF JUDGMENT ) IN FAVOR OF DANIELLE MARIE SOLANO, Defendant. ) AND AGAINST DEFENDANT ANDREW ) SAUL, THE COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ) SECURITY

Danielle Marie Solano asserts she is entitled to supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act. Plaintiff argues the administrative law judge erred in evaluating the medical record and rejecting limitations identified by physicians. For the reasons set forth below, the matter is REMANDED for further proceedings pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). BACKGROUND In October 2011,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.