Arzola

Arzola v. Robles

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20211:20-cv-00816California3,395 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ALEJANDRA ARZOLA, No. 1:20-cv-00816-NONE-SKO Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO GRANT IN PART AND DENY IN

v. PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO

DISMISS COMPLAINT

14 OSCAR ROBLES and CITY OF [Doc. 3] WOODLAKE, [THIRTY-DAY OBJECTION DEADLINE] Defendants. 17 I. Procedural History On February 10, 2020, Plaintiff Alejandra Arzola filed a complaint alleging a violation of her civil rights pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments, as well as various state torts, in the Tulare County Superior Court. (Doc. 1.) On June 11, 2020, Defendants Oscar Robles (“Robles”) and City of Woodlake (“City”) removed the action to this Court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1441, insofar as this Court has original jurisdiction over Plaintiff’s federal claim under 28 U.S.C. § 1331. (Doc. 1.) On June 15, 2020, Defendant City, joined by Defendant Robles, filed a motion to dismiss the complaint pursuant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.