Avalos

Avalos v. Franco De Pizano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20211:20-cv-01571California324 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE AVALOS, Case No. 1:20-cv-01571-DAD-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT

v. ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDERS

MARTHA FRANCO DE PIZANO, et al.,

FIVE DAY DEADLINE

Defendants.

16 George Avalos (“Plaintiff”) filed this action pursuan to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181 et seq. on November 6, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On January 24, 2021, a notice of settlement was filed and the parties were ordered to file dispositive documents within thirty days of January 28, 2021. (ECF Nos. 16, 17.) More than thirty days have passed and the parties have not filed dispositive documents. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 25 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.