Avalos
Avalos v. Franco De Pizano
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GEORGE AVALOS, Case No. 1:20-cv-01571-DAD-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PARTIES TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY SANCTIONS SHOULD NOT
v. ISSUE FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
COURT ORDERS
MARTHA FRANCO DE PIZANO, et al.,
FIVE DAY DEADLINE
Defendants.
16 George Avalos (“Plaintiff”) filed this action pursuan to the Americans with Disabilities Act, 42 U.S.C. §§ 12181 et seq. on November 6, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On January 24, 2021, a notice of settlement was filed and the parties were ordered to file dispositive documents within thirty days of January 28, 2021. (ECF Nos. 16, 17.) More than thirty days have passed and the parties have not filed dispositive documents. Local Rule 110 provides that “[f]ailure of counsel or of a party to comply with these Rules or with any order of the Court may be grounds for imposition by the Court of any and all sanctions . . . within the inherent power of the Court.” The Court has the inherent power to 25 …