Dikran

(PC) McRae v. Dikran

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 2, 20211:16-cv-01066California646 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-01066-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING IMPERMISSIBLE

SURREPLY

v. (ECF No. 92.)

BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al.,

Defendants.

15 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian,1 Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betts, for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) On October 23, 2020, defendant Bairamian filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 80.) On October 27, 2020, defendant Betz filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 81.)

27 1 In his original Complaint, Plaintiff referred to this…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.