Dikran
(PC) McRae v. Dikran
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
MICHAEL SCOTT McRAE, 1:16-01066-NONE-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, ORDER STRIKING IMPERMISSIBLE
SURREPLY
v. (ECF No. 92.)
BAIRAMIAN DIKRAN, et al.,
Defendants.
15 I. BACKGROUND Michael Scott McRae (“Plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). This case now proceeds with Plaintiff’s Second Amended Complaint filed on March 9, 2018, against defendants Dr. Dikran Bairamian,1 Dr. Kevin Cuong Nguyen, and Dr. David Betts, for inadequate medical care under the Eighth Amendment and state law claims for medical malpractice and medical battery. (ECF No. 14.) On October 23, 2020, defendant Bairamian filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 80.) On October 27, 2020, defendant Betz filed a motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 81.)
27 1 In his original Complaint, Plaintiff referred to this…