(PS) Johnson v. Lake Shastina Police Dept

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 3, 20212:19-cv-01193California410 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 POLLY JOHNSON, No. 2:19-CV-01193-MCE-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER LAKE SHASTINA POLICE

DEPARTMENT, LAKE SHASTINA

COMMUNITY SERVICES DISTRICT, a Municipal Corporation, RUSTY OWENS, individually and as an Officer of the Lake Shastina Police Department, MIKE WILSON, individually and as Chief of Police of the Lake Shastina Police Department, and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 19 Defendants.

Presently before the Court is a Motion to Withdraw as Counsel (ECF No. 8) and 22 Defendants’ Response to Motion to Withdraw (ECF No. 11). Plaintiff’s counsel, H.F. 23 Layton (“Counsel”), moves to withdraw after Plaintiff terminated his employment on 24 November 16, 2020, by which Plaintiff will remain in propria persona. This Motion is 25 governed by the requirements of Eastern District of California Local Rule 182(d), which 26 27 1 Having determined that oral argument would not be of material assistance, the Court ordered this Motion submitted on the briefing in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.