Smith v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20212:19-cv-01426California1,013 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CLIFFORD SMITH, KRISTINA No. 2:19–cv–01426–TLN–CKD

FLESHMAN,

ORDER CONTINUING HEARING ON PlaintiffS, MOTION TO COMPEL (ECF No. 19) TO

APRIL 7, 2021 &

v.

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE

COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 Defendant Angela Vickers, M.D., has filed a motion to compel plaintiffs Clifford Smith and Kristina Fleshman to furnish responses to a total of four sets of discovery, consisting of Special Interrogatories, Set One, and Requests for Production, Set One, propounded to each plaintiff. (ECF No. 19.) The motion was noticed for hearing before the undersigned on March 10, 2021, making plaintiff’s opposition due no later than March 3, 2021. See E.D. Cal. R. 251(e). There has been no opposition filed or other communication from plaintiffs’ counsel. Accordingly, plaintiffs’ counsel is ordered to show cause, in writing, why the court should not grant the motion to compel, ordering responses without objections, and to show cause, in writing,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.