(PC) Foust v. Consumer Attorney Marketing Service
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20212:20-cv-02553California1,286 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CARL FOUST, Case No. 2:20-cv-02553-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION
TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS
v. GRANTED
CONSUMER ATTORNEY ECF No.
MARKETING SERVICE,
SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: Defendant. (1) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR 16 (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND BY HIS
COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO DISMISSAL
OF CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS
CONSISTENT WITH THIS ORDER.
19 ECF No. 1
FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BE DENIED
AS MOOT
ECF No. 10 23 Plaintiff Carl Foust is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He names Consumer Attorney Marketing Service (“CAMS”) as the lone defendant. Plaintiff does not allege, as best I…