(PC) Foust v. Consumer Attorney Marketing Service

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20212:20-cv-02553California1,286 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 CARL FOUST, Case No. 2:20-cv-02553-WBS-JDP (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF’S APPLICATION

TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS IS

v. GRANTED

CONSUMER ATTORNEY ECF No.

MARKETING SERVICE,

SCREENING ORDER THAT PLAINTIFF: Defendant. (1) FILE AN AMENDED COMPLAINT; OR 16 (2) NOTIFY THE COURT THAT HE WISHES TO STAND BY HIS

COMPLAINT, SUBJECT TO DISMISSAL

OF CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS

CONSISTENT WITH THIS ORDER.

19 ECF No. 1

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION BE DENIED

AS MOOT

ECF No. 10 23 Plaintiff Carl Foust is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. He names Consumer Attorney Marketing Service (“CAMS”) as the lone defendant. Plaintiff does not allege, as best I…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.