Kang

Kang v. Credit Bureau Connection, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20211:18-cv-01359California4,998 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 6 SUNG GON KANG, CASE NO. 1:18-CV-01359-AWI-SKO

Plaintiff,

ORDER ON DEFENDANT’S MOTION

v. FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

CREDIT BUREAU CONNECTION, INC., (Doc. No. 81) Defendant.

12 13 Plaintiff Sung Gon Kang alleges that Defendant Credit Bureau Connection, Inc., caused him injury in its violation of several state and federal consumer credit reporting statutes. Credit Bureau now moves for summary judgment under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 56. For the following reasons, the Court will deny Credit Bureau’s motion. 18 BACKGROUND1 In November 2017, Kang sought to buy a car from an automobile dealership in Huntington Beach, California. Doc. No. 85-1, ¶ 19. When Kang applied for a loan to finance his purchase, the dealership conducted a credit check using the services of Credit Bureau. Id. Kang represents that the dealership informed him that it would not be able to extend him credit without a co-signer because…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.