(SS)Prudente

(SS)Prudente v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20211:21-cv-00322California735 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

FLORIDALMA V. PRUDENTE, Case No. 1:21-cv-00322-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS

v. WITHOUT PREJUDICE AND REQUIRING

PLAINTIFF TO FILE LONG FORM

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, APPLICATION

Defendant. (ECF No. 2)

TWENTY DAY DEADLINE

17 Floridalma V. Prudente (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in this action seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability benefits. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to U.S.C. § 1915. However, Plaintiff’s application does not establish that she is entitled to proceed in this action without prepayment of fees. Plaintiff application shows that the family receives $3,805.00 per month which is a yearly income of approximately $45,660.00. In order to proceed in court without prepayment…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.