Kyle

(PC) Harris v. Kyle

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 4, 20211:19-cv-00462California2,594 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

I. BACKGROUND

22 Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on April 9, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) The 23 complaint alleged, in relevant part, that Plaintiff reported having suicidal thoughts while housed 24 in the Short Term Restricted Housing unit (“STRH”) at California State Prison—Corcoran (“CSP—Corcoran”) because the windowless cells in STRH lack natural light, but Defendant Kyle nonetheless issued a chrono in September of 2016 indicating that he could be placed in STRH. (Id. at 11.) Plaintiff also alleges that Defendants were involved in a decision to place him in the Indecent Exposure Pilot Program (“IEX Program”), which mixed protective and non-protective custody inmates, despite knowing that if Plaintiff “programmed peacefully with the protective

custody inmates in IEX that he would be subject to attack by other non-protective custody

inmates when released back to general population.” (Id. at 19.) Plaintiff alleges that he had

physical altercations with protective custody inmates while in the IEX Program. (Id. at 19-20.) On May 28, 2019, the Court entered an order screening Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 5 10.) The Court found…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.