Teter
Teter v. FCA US LLC
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
8 PATRICK TETER, et al., Case No. 1:20-cv-01311-DAD-SAB Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT
TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE
v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41 (a) FCA US LLC, OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL
PROCEDURE
Defendant. (ECF No. 14) 14 On March 4, 2021, the parties filed a joint motion to dismiss this action with prejudice 16 pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi) which the court construes as a stipulation to dismiss 17 this action with prejudice. In light of the stipulation of the parties, this action has been 18 terminated, Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)Gi); Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th 19 Cir. 1997), and has been dismissed with prejudice. Accordingly, the Clerk of the Court is HEREBY ORDERED to CLOSE the file in this 21 case and adjust the docket to reflect voluntary dismissal of this action pursuant to Rule □□ (a).