Avalos

Avalos v. Franco De Pizano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20211:20-cv-01571California593 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 GEORGE AVALOS, Case No. 1:20-cv-01571-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, ORDER DISREGARDING STIPULATION

FOR DISMISSAL OF ENTIRE ACTION

v. (ECF No. 21) MARTHA FRANCO DE PIZANO, et al.,

FOURTEEN DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff George Avalos filed this action against Defendants Martha Franco De Pizano, Baljit Singh, and Mohinder Kaur on November 6, 2020. (ECF No. 1.) On November 23, 2020, Defendant De Pizano filed an answer to the complaint. (ECF No. 5.) On December 14, 2020, Defendants Mohinder Kaur and Baljit Singh filed an answer. (ECF No. 11.) On January 27, 2021, a notice of settlement was filed and the parties were ordered to file dispositional documents within thirty days of January 28, 2021. (ECF Nos. 16, 17.) On March 2, 2021, an order issued requiring the parties to show cause why sanctions should not issue for the failure to file dispositive documents in compliance with the January 28, 2021 order. (ECF No. 18.) On November 4, 2021, Defendants Kaur and Singh filed a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.