Lizzaraga

(PC) Henderson v. Lizzaraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 5, 20212:18-cv-02181California18,871 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

Case 2:18-cv-02181-JAM-DMC Document 106 Filed 03/05/21 Page 1 of

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, SR., No. 2:18-CV-2181-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOE LIZARRAGA, et al., Defendants.

Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C.

§ 1983. Before the Court is Defendant’s motion for summary judgment. ECF No. 56.

Plaintiff filed an opposition on February 2, 2021. ECF No. 105. The opposition was due January

19, 2021 and is untimely. See ECF No. 103. Nevertheless, given Plaintiff’s status as a pro se

prisoner and delays attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic, the Court will consider the opposition.

Defendant has not replied to Plaintiff’s opposition as permitted under Local Rule 230(l). The

undersigned United States Magistrate Judge recommends granting summary…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.