Carey
Storz Management Co. v. Carey
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 STORZ MANAGEMENT COMPANY, a No. 2:18-cv-00068-TLN-DB California Corporation, and STORZ REALTY, INC., Plaintiffs, ORDER v. ANDREW CAREY, an individual, and MARK WEINER, an individual, 16 Defendants.
18 This matter is before the Court on Plaintiffs Storz Management Company (“SMC”) and Storz Realty, Inc.’s (“SRI”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) Motion for Leave to Amend. (ECF No. 143.) Defendants Mark Weiner (“Weiner”) and Andrew Carey (“Carey”) (collectively, “Defendants”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 146.) Plaintiffs filed a reply. (ECF No. 148.) Also before the Court is Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition (ECF No. 29), and Defendants filed a reply (ECF No. 30). For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS Plaintiffs’ Motion to Amend (ECF No. 143) and DENIES Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 22) as moot. /// /// I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND Plaintiffs allege that Defendants, who…